3 Charged in St. Charles Attack on Gay Men, Female Companion
Two men and a woman face multiple charges stemming from what police are calling a hate crime against two gay men and the woman with them on Jan. 6 along Route 38 in St. Charles.
Two St. Charles men and a local woman face multiple felony counts as a result of a hate crime investigation St. Charles police launched after two gay men and a woman they were with were attacked on Jan. 6 after leaving a Lincoln Highway bar.
Stephan C. Bolt, 31, of the 4N800 block of East Mary Lane, Christopher M. Miner, 30, of the 100 block of North 15th Street, and Susan V. Patton, 31, of the 6N200 block of Woodland Road, face charges that range from aggravated battery to mob action to hate crime after the attack, which occurred in the 2000 Block of Lincoln Highway early on Jan. 6.
Police were called at 1:45 a.m. that day to a report of a disturbance in the 2000 block of Lincoln Highway (Route 38). Witnesses and the victims told police they were with a group of friends at a bar authorities earlier identified as parking lot of Time Out Sports Pub, at 2051 Lincoln Highway. After the bar closed, police said the victims were standing in the parking lot waiting for a cab when they were confronted by Patton who threw a drink into the face of the 26-year-old female victim. The victim and her two male companions walked away to avoid further confrontation, police said.
Instead of waiting for a cab, the trio opted to walk home, but as they walked across the parking lot, a gray-colored Mazda pulled up next to the victims and stopped, police said. Patton got out of the vehicle and again confronted the 26-year-old female victim, but her two male companions stepped between them to protect her, and they were struck by Patton.
Police said that Miner and Bolt then got out of the vehicle, and with Patton, they began punching and kicking the two male victims, while taunting them for being gay.
One of the victims was able to pull out a cellphone and call 9-1-1 and told the suspects that police were on their way. Patton, Bolt and Miner then got back into their vehicle and drove away, police said.
Police said the trio was accompanied by a fourth person — a woman — at the time of the incident. The Kane County State’s Attorney’s Office continues to reviews the results of the investigation for possible charges against her, police said.
Police said that Miner and Bolt were arrested late Friday afternoon, Jan. 25. Patton was taken into custody the next morning, Jan. 26.
Bolt and Miner were each charged with two counts of aggravated battery in a public way, a Class 3 felony; one count of mob action, a Class 4 felony; two counts of hate crime, a Class 4 felony; and four counts of battery, a Class A misdemeanor.
Patton is charged with two counts of aggravated battery in a public way, a Class 3 felony; one count of mob action, a Class 4 felony; two counts of hate crime, a Class 4 felony; and six counts of battery, a Class A misdemeanor.
Police said Miner was transported to the Kane County Jail, and that Bolt was released after posting $3,000 cash bond. Patton also was released after posting $3,000 cash bond. The three are scheduled to appear in court at 9 a.m. Feb. 15 in Room 217 of the Kane County Judicial Center.
On it’s website, the FBI has a civil rights page with an overview about hate crimes that states, “Congress has defined a hate crime as a ‘criminal offense against a person or property motivated in whole or in part by an offender's bias against a race, religion, disability, ethnic origin or sexual orientation.’ ”
Let Patch save you time. Have local stories delivered directly to your inbox with our free newsletter. Fast signup here.
Then like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter at @StCharlsILPatch.
Cindy Brown Doll
4:03 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
Just the smirk on her face makes me sick. I hope justice will be served.
Jennifer SHarp
4:20 am on Saturday, March 16, 2013
That is exactly what I thought looking at her like this is funny....no remorse!
joe torre
5:06 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
Real tough guys picking on people that can't protect themselves. These are the guys that don't have the balls to pick on somebody their size one on one. Maybe our justice system will act properly and put these guys in jail to get pay back.
Firefighter 57
5:30 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
Since I forgot to say it in my comments I'll second your emotion, Joe...COWARDS!!!
Jim Vielbig
6:36 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
Hopefully with other witnesses they are convicted of a hate crime, something that policically astute Judges are taking more seriously than battery. Idiots
Dented
8:51 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
You are saying because the "victims" are "gay" they cant protect themselves? Maybe they should have though of that before they put there hands on a woman.
O.B.
5:24 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
So much for, United and Equal People! May these three - "Miner, Bolt, and Patton" enjoy a long jail time.
Firefighter 57
5:29 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
These individuals are absolutely DISGUSTING and I'm ashamed to know that they live in the same area as I do! I wish they could endure the same HATE punishment that they've inflicted on these innocent victims but, since that isn't possible, I hope they AT LEAST serve time behind bars!
Kevin
5:37 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
They make me sick. Bunch of cowards.
77777777
6:47 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
Two sides to EVERY STORY!!!!!!!
Kevin
8:24 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
Well 777777777 the three bullies side of the story landed them in jail for a hate crime. What a bunch of dopes. I hope they learned their lesson, but the smirk on her face say's otherwise.
Andrea Ahlsen
8:24 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
This is really sad. Come on, we are in 2013. If you cannot learn to function in society with all kinds of people then quit now. If you did indeed do the things that were mentioned in this article, please be certain to keep yourself out of most social and work circles. This kind of behaviors is highly, highly unacceptable. And if you go to jail, best wishes. It will be rough.
jamie
8:27 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
That smirk makes me want to beat the crap out of her! I ope they get jail time.
Ted Schnell
10:48 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
Jamie, I'd ask you to consider what you wrote. Does the desire to do violence on someone, no matter how stupidly they behaved, warrant violence?
Smitty
9:52 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
Looks like Miner has quite the criminal background. Maybe this will keep him in jail a little longer. Susan has an on-line resume that indicates she is a preschool teacher. Nice.
Firefighter 57
10:27 pm on Monday, January 28, 2013
77777777777777777777777, REALLY?? There ARE two sides to every story but I'm gonna' guess this one is pretty clear-cut!
Dented
8:50 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
These are B.S. trumped up charges. It doesnt mention anywhere in this article how one of the male "victims" hit Patton in her face and began attacking her before miner and bolt stepped in to stop the "victims from hitting patton any further. Because the "vicitms" were gay men st.charles authorities felt the need to charge it as a "hate crime". Complete B.S. Learn the facts before you comment and judge.
Jim Gore
11:56 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Dented, really, I was just looking at her picture and had a few other people look at too. She does not look like she got hit in the face. Oh wait, I know the swelling and the marks disappeared overnight.
If that is what really happened then why did they run?
Dented
1:22 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Mr. Gore it took STC PD a week if not longer to do their investigation and make any arrests. Marks can and usually do disappear after a week. BS Trumped up charges because STC has nothing better to do. Calling it a hate crime is ridiculous as is the police department in STC. Maybe Patton doesnt have worse injuries because Miner and Bolt were there and stopped any further action from the "victims". What makes you think they "ran". Maybe they simply left the situation before it escalated further. This news article just like the charges are absolutely ridiculous.
Dented
1:32 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
This happened on Jan 6th. These 3 were just charged and arrested within the few days. So yes, any marks on Pattons face would be gone at this point. Again, learn facts before you comment and judge.
Ted Schnell
1:42 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Dented: As I understand it, the investigation began right after the incident was reported. Where are you getting information that it took at least a week?
Laura K
9:43 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013
Dented, if the accused had not continued to follow and hassle the woman and men and instead just let it go...they would not be in the position they are now. Choices. We all make them.
Laura K
9:47 am on Monday, February 4, 2013
Ted Schnell I am surprised at your query to Dented regards his knowledge of the length of time it took from the incident to the arrest pertaining to marks that may have or have not been on Ms.Patton.
Your name appears in the byline yet you seem unaware as to the dates involved... which are in the very article. This incident took place on January 6 and the arrests were made on January 25 and 26. Below a cut & paste from the article:
"Police said that Miner and Bolt were arrested late Friday afternoon, Jan. 25. Patton was taken into custody the next morning, Jan. 26."
This is not in any way shape or form to be taken as supportive of the three accused. Just dismayed that the author of the piece does not seem knowledgeable on what it contained. Critical thinking demands this be pointed out.
Ted Schnell
12:02 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013
Laura K., I am not ignorant of the timeline here. The initial incident was reported Jan. 6. The arrests came several weeks later. Police were conducting their investigation during that time. I believe my response to Dented referenced solely the timeline of the investigation, not to any marks that may or may not have been left on anyone involved in this.
Laura K
2:49 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013
Dented said:
"Mr. Gore it took STC PD a week if not longer to do their investigation and make any arrests. Marks can and usually do disappear after a week."
Ted Schnell replied:
Dented: As I understand it, the investigation began right after the incident was reported. Where are you getting information that it took at least a week?
Considering the content from Dented referenced the lack of marks on the lady...and that it took longer than a week to conclude....I just did not see where Dented was saying it took a week to start the investigation... he was speaking of the conclusion, arrest and subsequent mug shots. Your response appeared to indicate he was speaking of the investigation starting. I misunderstood your response (which did not really apply to the original comment) to mean you did not know the timeline involved.
Anyhow, enough time on this. My misunderstanding of what you were talking about with your off base response is not surprising, considering the lack of connection to the original remark. There is no shame in making a retraction or correction.... I have two words for you, *journalistic integrity*. A little something I learned about back in the day.
Laura K
2:53 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013
Dented, as I read through these comments it became apparent that Mr. Gore did not read and digest the article as the incident date and arrest date, both within the article, were clearly missed by him.
Ted Schnell
3:04 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013
Laura K,
I correct myself when I make a mistake and consider that just one aspect of journalistic integrity, which I value highly and have since I entered this profession 30 years ago.
If I had seen a need to do so here, I would have -- and have openly acknowledged mistakes or misunderstandings in other comment threads. I am trying to understand how (and which) response was off base and why.
Jim Gore
4:03 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013
Clearly, I did not look at the dates. The point is this should have ended when the one group walked away.
77777777
9:00 am on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Amaen dented!!!!!! Like I said before. ..TWO SIDES TO EVERY STORY!!!!
Jim Gore
1:32 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Dented:
Instead of waiting for a cab, the trio opted to talk home, but as they walked across the parking lot, a gray-colored Mazda pulled up next to the victims and stopped, police said. Patton got out of the vehicle and again confronted the 26-year-old female victim, but her two male companions stepped between them to protect her, and they were struck by Patton.
Per the above the victims left on there own. This whole thing should have stopped then
One of the victims was able to pull out a cellphone and call 9-1-1 and told the suspects that police were on their way. Patton, Bolt and Miner then got back into their vehicle and drove away, police said.
The a bove is why I say they ran, if there is another side of the story why did they leave? They could have stayed and waited for the police to give there side of the story.
Laura K
9:45 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013
Jim Gore...agreed. If only the accused had just let it go they would not be in the situation they are now.
Jim Gore
1:37 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Dented: Chill I am not judging, I am just asking questions that do not make sense to me and some of co-workers here.
If you knew me, I am the last person to judge anyone, let alone something that I was not a witness too.
Jim Gore
2:31 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Dent and 77777777
Yes, there is always another side to every story, you two seem to have the other side of this story. This is the form to let all of us know the other side.
Please do not think that I believe that Saint Charles is the perfect place to live, it is not, I am not like the rest of Saint Charles with my head buried in the sand. This town has issues and problems just like every other town in the US does. If half of Saint Charles with their smart phones download a police scanner app and tuned to the Tri-Cities. I bet there would be a increase in heart attacks. I am one that listens it when I cannot get to sleep at night, there is a lot stuff happening in Saint Charles that I hear, but never see in any of the local papers.
John
2:39 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Ms. Patton sounds like she had a few too many and made some bad choices. The two other guys are probably wishing they didn't hook up with her that night. My suggestion to all of them is to move into Chicago and get some gay friends. You're all 31 years old and need to move out of your parent's suburb. St Charles is a beautiful place to raise kids when you're ready to grow up. I hope the victims will forgive them and drop the charges. After all, no one was really hurt. C'mon!.
Jim Gore
3:01 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Umm there are Gay people here the Tri-Cities even in Saint Charles. Move out of parents suburb , I have laugh about that, my wife was born and raised here Saint Charles, I called told her we had to move out. All kidding aside, yes this is a great place to raise kids, the schools are great. But please do not think that Saint Charles does not have any gay people living here, they do just like every town does. They might even go to your same church as you go too and live on your same block.
Laura K
9:47 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013
At this point dropping the charges may not be up to the victims.
John
3:52 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Jim, I'm sorry that I didn't acknowledge that gays are part of every community and should be treated as equals. I'm not sure that the victims in this case are even gay. We have heard people-especially when they're a little tanked, make a gay slur at someone even though they are not homosexual. Being from a more urban environment, I often wonder about 31year olds in remote burbs like St. Charles carrying on like they're in the Wild West. My gut feeling is they wouldn't behave like this if they were in boys town or any other gay community. The numbers would would be stacked against them.
John
4:10 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
At 1.45am all kinds of stupid stuff is happening everywhere. Ask the police.
K-bird
5:06 pm on Tuesday, January 29, 2013
Funny, Bolt used to live in a very gay neighborhood in Chicago... Methinks the lady doth protest too much!
bs
1:27 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013
Get a life you losers. Mind your own business and deal with your own problems. Ooh wait that's this pussy ass town for you
Jim Gore
1:41 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013
HAHAHAHA-Too Funny
ugh
2:02 pm on Wednesday, January 30, 2013
I hope they all end up in prison for a very long time. Their actions not only affected the ones immediately involved, but innocent children as well. Absolutely selfish and disgusting!
Get your facts right
12:05 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013
Listen up everyone, there truly is two sides to every story.... There was a fight, and it had nothing to do with being gay nor not being gay. It just so happens that someone involved n this incident was gay. There is nothing wrong with being gay, and for those involved i dont think it matters was sexual orientation you are, it just so happend that someone was gay. A fight happened, nut it had nothing to do with being gay or not being gay! So before anyone passes judgement, or tries to think they know what they are talking about, get your facts straight!!!! Being GAy had nothing to do with it, it just happens to be an easy way to get people in trouble for the wrong reasons! Seriously grow up, be adults here, and get your facts under controll before you judge, or press charges for the wrong reason, your going to ruin peoples lives, when Gay had NOTHING to do with it!!!!!!! by the way i am gay, and i know this all for FACT!!!!!!!! you all know nothing, you were not there and cant say anythything one way or another!!!!!
Get your facts right
12:10 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013
This is a joke, people dont you have anythng better to do with your lives... i mean your gay and thats cool, but why cahrge people with a hate crime. This is not a hate crime, and if your so uncomfortable with yourself as a gay to charge people with a hate crime, them you need to take a good long look in the mirror. Just because someone beat you up, maybe its not because your gay, mabe its beacause of something you did, Maybe it was just bad kuck crossing your path. Really You could make or break these peoples lives, think long and hard before you let this go on, Karma is what they say.
ugh
8:56 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013
Assault for "some thing you did" at their age is uncalled for. Who goes around getting into bar fights in their thirties?! At that age, maybe everyone involved should have thought of the consequences of their actions before they went around beating people up in a parking lot. Maybe this will be the wake up call to finally take responsibility for themselves.
Johnny Truth
12:30 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013
The fact that the men attacked were gay does not make it a hate crime, you are correct there. However, the FACT that the woman looked one of the guys square in the eyes and said "F****t" and punched him in the face makes it a hate crime. Oh, and also that as one of the guys was protecting the other by laying over his motionless body, and the same woman yelled "F****t's" and ran over and kicked him in the back makes it a hate crime.
I'm wondering if you were there or if you just heard the story second hand, either way please stop spreading lies.
Jim Gore
3:28 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013
Clearly, I did not look at the dates. The point is this should have ended when the one group walked away.
Firefighter 57
12:32 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013
All that most of us have to go on, not personally knowing any of the parties involved, is what is reported to us in the media. It isn't always correct but we don't know the until more evidence surfaces or is sorted out. Nobody is ruining any lives here...don't they have a trial set for next month? These is merely a forum, as someone above mentioned, to discuss our opinions on what we read in the posted article.
Ted Schnell
12:59 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013
Here's a couple of things to consider from the guy who reported the story.
First, the police conducted the investigation, and the information and evidence they gathered is what prompted the prosecutors to authorize the charges, which included hate crime.
Second, the facts in the case are what the police released to the media.
Third, these three are, under law, innocent until proven guilty. There are a whole lot of things that could happen from this point forward -- charges could be dropped or reduced, or pleas-bargained to lesser charges, or they could be acquitted -- or a combination of these. Lord knows there are enough charges facing each one of these three that even if the one hate crime charge is dropped, they're each still in a heap of trouble. But this will play out in the courts.
One thing is certain in all of this: There were some really stupid decisions made before the police got involved, and there are consequences for acting stupidity. I'm not judging when I say that -- it's just a matter of fact.
DHD
11:27 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013
I thought you are the editor. Why do you keep sticking your opinion into the comments section?
Ted Schnell
1:41 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013
DHD,
First off, editors always have had opinions, some choosing to voice them in newspaper columns. At the same time, the nature of the "Opinions" page has changed since it moved to online platforms like the comments and blogs sections presented by Patch. That has changed the “traditional” role of the editor, a change which in my opinion puts journalism closer to its roots in terms of how it was established in America.
Second, there is a difference between opinion and an observation of objective fact, which from time to time I will point point out in the comments section. People sometimes become so angry or emotionally caught up in an issue that they lose site of where objective truth ends and opinion or perception begins. So, I will pop in from time to time on a conversation and point out the truth as it can be objectively demonstrated.
Third, as local editor, I also moderate these discussions. I check the comments regularly to ensure people are not crossing the line in terms of personal attacks, misinformation vs. truth, whether the “conversation” is being carried on respectfully — things like that related to the Patch terms of service. This is frequently a more subjective part of my job, because when a debate about one’s viewpoint gets heated, it might walk a line between angry and disrespectful or threatening, for example.
babyj
8:00 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013
I have never commented on a story pror to this but i am finding it necessary to comment here.... I know the accused persons above and i have read one side in the paper and heard the other side as well and i have pretty much come to the conclusion that this has gone a little far... I think the hate crime charge is STC PD going after these people ~ u seen their records, its obvious. I know they were not beat up because they were gay, however i do believe that there was a good chance that as they were arguing negative comments might have been thrown out there. Im not stating that this is ok but ive been around to the bars and bartended 10+ years and ive seen a lot. People drink to much and say hurtful things to people they even care about. From what i heard the "victims" did not even press charges but because it was labeled "hate crime" the case was picked up by stc or county or whomever, which furthers me to believe they are out to get them. Im not stating they should get off with a wrist slap because i beleive the fight should have never started, or at least stopped at the bar. I also dont beleive the victims are as innocent as they claim, i believe they got to tell there story because of prior history and rap sheets of the accused.... we are not 21 anymore and need to grow up a bit or learn how to handle our alcohol.
John
10:36 am on Thursday, January 31, 2013
Let's give credit to The Time out Sports Pub of STC for serving too many drinks to these folks. The courts, lawyers, and counselors (anger and alcohol) thank you for helping them fill their pockets with fines and fees.
Johnny Truth
12:36 pm on Thursday, January 31, 2013
I don't think its fair to accredit any blame to the bar, purely because we don't know how long the group was at the location, or how much they consumed there. These people easily could of shown up to the bar drunk, had one, and left.
We are in an economy and that is someones business and livelihood.
babyj
11:56 am on Friday, February 1, 2013
if they were attacked because they were gay then i believe it should classify as hate crime. I agree that being the one attacked and having such awful things said to you is very damaging to anyone but if you are going to call it hate crime then every woman, man and child ever abused physically, verbally, or emotionally by their parent or spouse, their attacker should also be convicted of a hate crime instead of domestic battery or child abuse. I believe what Ted is saying is true, the is not clearly defined and is controversal. I feel sorry for the attacked persons and cant imagine the embarrasment and humiliation and emotions they are going thru, but i also believe that there is a little more to the story and hopefully the justice system will figure it out and handle appropriatly,
me
11:58 am on Friday, February 1, 2013
was it really necessary to put up all these hateful words against them? yes they messed up. yes they will learn their lesson. but its their business not ours.......... so wake up ...go to work... come home...eat dinner and go to sleep. they will deal with their problems without all the snide remarks on this public website....im surprised half these comments havnt been taken off yet .
Firefighter 57
1:46 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
I don't believe there are any comments posted that warrant being removed. Hate crime or not these three individuals are charged with PHYSICALLY BEATING UP three other individuals. I think it's everyone's right to comment on their poor judgement and bad choices that night! There are LOTS of other people that go to bars and even get drunk and don't go out and physically harm other people! Their arrest and everything that comes along with it is a matter of public record and we have every right to be disgusted by their actions and comment on our feelings. As for learning their lesson, if someone has a criminal history and a list of other convictions then they obviously ARE NOT learning their lesson and most likely WILL NOT this time around...they made this "OUR BUSINESS" when they decided to commit a crime!
JuleS
9:26 am on Monday, February 4, 2013
Just goes to show that even in our award-winning, "family friendly" city of St. Charles, neanderthals are still living among us. All three of these pigs should be locked up for a minimum 10 years and when released, be sure their names are prominently promoted in all news outlets.
JuleS
9:33 am on Monday, February 4, 2013
Are you freakin' kidding!?!?
"They will deal with their problems without all the snide remarks on this public website" -- you must follow their same sick, twisted beliefs about gays (and who knows what and whom else) to make such comments that even remotely empathize with their "plight."
And your statement that it's "their business" and not ours goes to show just how profoundly ignorant you are -- the woman was a teacher, for God's sake. You don't think her actions affect anyone else? What about the two gays the three pigs attacked? Seems to me it was THEIR business.
What planet are you from, moron? Please go back -- we don't need any more boneheads walking among us.
Ted Schnell
11:55 am on Monday, February 4, 2013
One more reminder that all three are innocent until proven guilty.
Meg
12:13 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
She is a teacher?! I wouldn't want someone that beats people up watching my kids!! Hope she doesn't have any kids herself, she would be an awful parent!
John
10:40 pm on Friday, February 1, 2013
I apologize that technology has allowed me to catch this story and to respond to it any way I want. I have to admit that I've been entertained by doing minimal research on the subjects by googling their names. My gut feeling is that these characters are pathetic but forgivable and not really the people we need in our jails. I know the victims feel a little ruffled but no one was hurt. Lets get over this incident and save room in our lock ups for white collar criminals that stole millions from us and will get bonuses this year.
JAY JAY
9:11 am on Saturday, February 2, 2013
Get real folks the Closet Doors have been flung open.
It's an accepted way of life NationWide now,
both in Schools, Politics, Hollywood and work places.
Look at Barney Frank and his new HeShe wife!!!
The new modern age is here, like it or not we must all live with it !!!!
Jay Walker
8:35 pm on Saturday, February 2, 2013
1. This behavior is more common among teens and young adults in their 20s, but these three are in their 30s?
2. Ironic this incident occurred not too far from the very county court that they will visit often in the coming months.
Anonymous
2:01 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013
These FOUR people got in the car after the first confrontation and decided to get back out the car to harass them more (remember the drink thrown in the girls face as susan left?) Can you say PREMEDITATED!!!! Susan didn't get the reaction out of them the first time so shr got out here car for more....! Tired of these people and their "crew" running around st charles thinking they own/run the bar they are occupying. Im anticipating the states decision on charging that 4the person and I think its about time this charade comes to an end!
Anonymous
2:04 pm on Monday, February 4, 2013
Meg Sad truth Susan has a daughter :(
John
9:19 am on Tuesday, February 5, 2013
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hC3Yra2nMy4
Meg
1:08 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
:( that is very sad.
Stcharles
12:39 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
My guess is that at least one of the three criminals or their shameful defendants are participating in this thread. If so let me take this opportunity to address Ms. Patton who after committing this crime returned to her workplace teaching two years olds. She did not report this disgusting hateful felony to anyone. As a result she was in the company of my child. She had an obligation to report this incident and did not, not even after the arrest. Our family is horrified to think that our sweet toddler was in the presence of someone capable of such terrible hate and violence. Ms. Patton should spend some time considering what legal action the parents of her students may take.
Ted Schnell
1:38 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Just a reminder that Patton and the others have been charged with the crimes. They have not been convicted.
Stcharles
2:17 pm on Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Yes. That is correct. They have not been convicted. As a child care provider Ms. Patton was responsible to report an arrest. Anytime an individual is fingerprinted it is reported to DCFS.
Meg
1:09 pm on Thursday, February 14, 2013
So if she does have a child, and has to report this to DCFS would her child be taken away and would she be able to continue to teach? How is she even still able to teach?
Reality
9:54 pm on Tuesday, March 26, 2013
Most of you idiots so cocerned about what happened were not even thier. Judgig by some comments, some of you were. Wo cares what happened, it is none of your business. Ughh!!! Who ever you are, are you a stalker??? If Bolt has 20 felonies, who cares. Do you know the circumstances behind them. I have 13 felonies and I run a security firm and make BIG BANK, So shut your mouth until you know what you are talking about nigger. For all you uneducated people that means ignorant.
Firefighter 57
10:38 pm on Tuesday, March 26, 2013
Congrats on your large number of felonies AND your job, you must be very proud! This story became PUBLIC business when these criminals committed another crime! Who are you to call anyone else that has commented uneducated? You come off as the uneducated one when you use that racist term that you just posted, you're disgusting!