The St. Charles City Council, in its last scheduled meeting of 2012, voted unanimously Monday night to purchase the former , with an eye toward partnering with the , to provide it with additional facilities.
The cost of the $225,000 purchase will be paid for through savings the city achieved on some of its capital projects over the past year, or from capital projects that were planned but can be delayed, said St. Charles City Administrator Brian Townsend.
George’s closed in the second quarter of the year after a more than 40-year run. The business, owned by the Poczekaj family, offered a variety of sports equipment and gear. Its first floor was devoted to retail use, and the second floor held two apartments, which have been vacant for several years, Townsend said.
After they closed the business, Townsend said, the Poczekaj family approached the city to see if it would be interested in purchasing their building.
In recent years, the property had become a top target for downtown stakeholders, including the Downtown St. Charles Partnership, because of its appearance and its prominent Main Street location, he added.
“What happened earlier this year is that the owners closed the sporting goods store, they approached the city about a potential interest in purchasing the property, and we were able to negotiate what we believe is a very fair and attractive price — $225,000,” Townsend said. The building totals 6,600 square feet on the first and second floors.
The building is in need of attention, and Townsend said, and the city has identified some of those needs, which it will sort into short-, mid-, and long-term priorities.
Some of the needs include roof repairs, some structural stabilization work needed in the basement, new doors and windows, tuck-pointing the masonry, among others. “So there are further investments that will need to be made to bring the building up to the proper conditions,” he said. “And we want to make the building look nice,” particularly since it fronts on Main Street.
Townsend said the city has not yet entered into talks about partnering with the Arcada in the venture. If that does not pan out, he said the building could be fixed up and put on the market, although “I think our plan would be to hold it for a while.”
Still, the Arcada has indicated in the past an interest in its next-door neighbor as the most logical direction for an expansion.
Related:
- George’s Building Could Be an Annex to Arcada
Let Patch save you time. Have local stories delivered directly to your inbox with our free newsletter. Fast signup here. Then like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter at @StCharlsILPatch.
Termination of Access We want to keep Patch a safe and friendly place, so in addition to any right or remedy that may be available to us under these Terms of Use or applicable law, we may suspend, limit or terminate your account, or all or a portion of your access to the Service, at any time with or without notice and with or without cause. In addition, we may refer any information on illegal activities, including your identity, to the proper authorities. Including the police and/or your parents. Thanks for your attention to this.
The acquisition of the sporting goods store property is a private venture, not an acquisition for use by the city. If the property "is available at such a good price" perhaps you and Mr. James should pool your money and/or attract other investors and buy the building, renovate it and sell it at a profit. Risking your investment to make a profit would be comendable. Putting taxpayer money at risk is a whole different situation. The City buying the building is likely to happpen, given the unanimous vote in the City Council. It will be interesting to see what the return on the taxayer's forced investment will yield.
http://stcharlesil.gov/sites/default/files/meetings/2011/attachments/a03-07-11-cc-IIB2.pdf http://www.dailyherald.com/article/20100307/news/303079944/print/ http://insidestcharles.com/category/collaboration/page/2/
The City has invested in Mr. Onesti and he has returned the favor. This purchase seems like a very good investment. The building was deteriorating rapidly and the purchase was for the good of all St. Charles- IMO. It's disappointing to see the amount of vitriol and hatred spewed on these forums.